The Price of Genius: A Nobel Prize Lost Over Chocolates

Imagine being an extraordinary scientist whose groundbreaking discovery has the potential to alter the course of humanity. Envy arises among your peers, leading them to claim your findings as their own, ultimately earning them a Nobel Prize. Meanwhile, you face a tragic end due to cancer at just 37. This unfortunate series of events unfolds because you declined a simple box of chocolates.

This is not just a hypothetical scenario.

But there's more to the story.

Following your passing, one of your colleagues pens a bestselling book about his "intellectual journey," portraying you as an unattractive and rebellious adolescent. Barely buried, your legacy is reduced to ridicule. He capitalizes on your work for decades, untouched by the consequences of his actions, and is currently a lively 92-year-old residing in Chicago. Despite a minor controversy regarding a racially insensitive comment, he enjoys a comfortable retirement. Meanwhile, you remain a forgotten genius. Such is life.

So, would you choose to live this life?

By the way, your response to this question reveals much about your character.

What Would You Sacrifice Your Genius For?

If a psychic or tarot reader foretold your fate, what would you do? Imagine they told you that while the Internet would be filled with articles about the routines of great men like Nikola Tesla and Ernest Hemingway, your own morning habits would go unnoticed.

Now, suppose the psychic offered you an opportunity to trade places. You could exchange your life for a 50 percent chance of a brighter future, potentially extending your life to 82 or even 92 years.

However, the second catch is significant—there's a 50 percent chance that no one else will make the discoveries you did, meaning humanity could take years or even decades to uncover the insights you unlocked through your tireless dedication.

The third catch? You would have no memory of your previous life.

So, would you part with your genius? Would you sacrifice humanity's progress for a chance at fame, wealth, or a longer life?

Your answer defines you.

Would You Still Try If You Knew You'd Fail?

This ultimately hinges on your understanding of failure. For many, losing a prestigious award and dying young certainly qualifies as failure, even if circumstances are beyond your control.

Now, imagine the psychic recounts your tragic life story without offering a better alternative.

You are aware that you'll pass away at 37, and your work will merely serve to bolster another's ego for years to come.

Would you continue your research? Would you dedicate 12 to 20 hours a day in the lab, documenting molecular structures? Or would you decide to abandon it all and seek solace at a bar?

How many of your final days would you spend in self-pity? How much meaningless escapism would you indulge in?

Your response to this question defines you.

What Would You Change to Gain Acceptance?

Your colleagues harbor a range of grievances against you. They assume you're meant to be their assistant and believe you work for them. One supervisor enjoys post-work drinks, but you never join him.

You're too engrossed in your research.

They criticize your appearance, hairstyle, and voice, deeming you difficult to deal with.

Every utterance is perceived as arrogance, and in their eyes, you need to be more approachable.

This hostility drives you to isolate yourself in your lab, leading them to claim your work and mock you posthumously.

They simply don't like you.

What would you change to gain their acceptance and prevent them from appropriating your work? Would you conform to their expectations in dress or style? Would you socialize with them, laughing at their jokes despite feeling out of place in your lab?

Your answer defines you.

Who Truly Discovered the Double Helix?

The fictional scientist we've discussed is a British woman from the 1950s.

It has become increasingly clear that the renowned Watson and Crick did not independently discover DNA's structure. They utilized Rosalind Franklin's research without her consent, publishing their findings in a 1953 edition of Nature and taking the lion's share of the credit.

"How would she look if she took off her glasses and did something novel with her hair?" — James Watson, The Double Helix.

Five years later, Franklin succumbed to ovarian cancer after spending her career in a dilapidated lab, struggling for funding while making remarkable advancements despite systemic disadvantages.

In 1962, Watson, Crick, and Wilkins accepted their award in Stockholm, barely acknowledging her contribution.

As if that weren’t enough, Watson mocked Franklin in his bestselling memoir, reminiscing about their meeting and speculating on her appearance without glasses.

Watson also admitted they never directly sought her findings; they merely obtained them through her male colleague, Maurice Wilkins, who shared in the award.

Would You Accept Chocolates After a Disagreement?

If you believe that Rosalind Franklin lost her chance at a Nobel Prize due to a box of chocolates, you'd be correct.

Maurice Wilkins often viewed himself as Franklin's supervisor, unaware of her expertise in X-ray diffraction.

He was dismissive, and while she made it clear she wouldn't tolerate such behavior, she avoided drama.

However, drama found her.

While Franklin toiled away in her lab, Wilkins boasted about her research, making unfounded claims. Franklin grew frustrated and told him to leave her alone.

Her work wasn't ready yet; he needed to be patient.

One day, in an attempt to mend their relationship, Wilkins offered Franklin a box of chocolates. She felt insulted and refused his gift.

"Rosalind wasn't someone who could be charmed by a silly gift, and she knew Wilkins would never have bought sweets for a male colleague." — Michael Ford, A Life Story: Rosalind Franklin.

She questioned whether he’d ever extend such a gesture to a male counterpart with whom he had a contentious relationship. The answer was clear: rejected chocolates marked the beginning of Wilkins' betrayal.

A Box of Chocolates and a Fatal Vacation

The final blow came during a brief getaway. Most of us don’t concern ourselves with our colleagues' weekend activities, but Franklin did.

She took a trip to France with friends to unwind. During her absence, Wilkins shared her findings with Watson and Crick, directly defying a supervisor who understood Franklin's groundbreaking potential. Wilkins chose to betray her.

Watson and Crick, eager for a breakthrough, listened intently. Wilkins soon forged a close friendship with them, sharing Franklin's insights while deriding her efforts. They utilized her data to formulate their famous double-helix model.

Men appropriated a woman's research, only to win a Nobel Prize following her death.

Would You Give Up in the Face of Failure?

Rosalind Franklin chose resilience. Some accounts suggest she eventually recognized what her colleagues had done.

Yet, she remained unfazed. Why?

She never held Watson and Crick’s model in high regard, even post-publication, believing they lacked sufficient proof. She persisted in publishing and conducting her own research to validate DNA's double-helix structure.

She was driven by the pursuit of truth, not accolades.

Will You Rush or Get It Right?

Franklin prioritized accuracy over speed. She understood that rushing typically leads to error, which is precisely what Watson and Crick did, relying on her findings.

Toward the end of her life, she embraced a new job and embarked on fresh research regarding the tobacco mosaic virus. She formed new friendships and even reconciled with Watson.

She refused to be weighed down by failure.

Would You Crawl to Work?

Even after her cancer diagnosis, Rosalind Franklin maintained her work ethic. On some mornings, she felt so weak she had to crawl to her lab. She declined assistance, demonstrating immense resilience.

This determination moved her colleagues to tears.

Franklin was unyielding and committed to her work despite overwhelming challenges, yet she received little recognition until the last years of her life. She anticipated this fate, yet she persevered.

"Though she must have faced sexism, she never complained in her writings about it. However, the prejudiced attitudes of the time are evident in the words of many men who wrote about her. Rosalind was no pushover and would stand up for herself and her ideas." — Michael Ford, A Life Story: Rosalind Franklin.

Ultimately, it comes down to your definition of failure. For many, failure equates to losing credit for your hard work, missing out on prestigious accolades, and dying too soon.

However, Rosalind Franklin did not perish feeling like a failure. Her friends and colleagues never viewed her that way either.

She passed away doing what she loved. Sometimes, success doesn't align with societal expectations. A life may appear tragic when one fixates on missed opportunities.

Franklin's true genius lay in her ability to craft her own version of success. Had she conformed to societal norms, she likely would have faced the same fate; her work would still have been appropriated.

Untrustworthy individuals will exploit you, regardless of your demeanor.

Key Takeaways

Franklin remained indifferent to public approval, especially when it interfered with scientific integrity. Throughout her career, she stood firm on uncomfortable truths, often met with resistance from older male colleagues. She understood:

You must challenge authority.
Practicality is key.
Precision matters.
Relentlessness is essential.
Focus on your work.

The relentless pursuit of knowledge fueled Rosalind Franklin, ultimately ensuring her name would be remembered.

Her story reflects a broader truth: individuals, regardless of gender, often face intellectual theft. Others may benefit from our inspiration while reaping accolades.

One must not allow this to deter them. Life is too fleeting to wait for validation that may never arrive. Instead, dedicate yourself to what truly matters. No one else will do it for you.

This is especially true for those who feel unlucky.

Be inspired once more.

Life is short. Strive to accomplish something extraordinary first.

corneretageres.com